Let spam sink to the bottom

>>1
>>2
>>3
>>5
>>6
I love these

It's as if no one learned anything about the computer and its use strictly by intuition

>>7
Yeah, it's like everyone has a broomstick up their arse about being "correct" and "enterprise" about computers. You don't see art like this on computer mags anymore.

>>8

That's because art is a dead art form. Fanart is where it's at now.

>>9
So. Rule 34 on the ACM?

The latest IEEE Spectrum is out!

http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/aug07/inthisissue

VC: withug

>>8
They almost look like Highlights covers

I was surprised at first that someone besides me remembers Highlights, but after a quick Google search to come up with a relevant image I discovered that it's still in production, which... well, ok, perhaps that's not so surprising either.

Anyway, remember the 3-2-1 Contact magazine?

... my tripcode doesn't work here, what

/r/ A scan of one of those infamous "type in your program in hex, cuss like a sailor for hours" mag pages.

Though I remember that some magazine provided the stuff with error correcting codes? Or am I going sclerotic?

Last of the metacovers

>>19
The March 1984 cover intrigues me

I could only imagine what they covered

>>20

Here's the table of contents. Unfortunately you (still?) need a subscription to access the articles:

xttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/tocresult.jsp?isYear=1984&isnumber=34740&Submit32=Go+To+Issue

I wonder where all that effort for the 5th generation project went to. I really felt down went bossman told me "we don't do research here" when I suggested Prolog to solve a problem instead of "The Java".